We can't scoop them all the time--all of us have day jobs or other obligations, after all. (But imagine what we can do if this was our full-time job/s! Anyone want to sponsor us as an independent, nonprofit news organization?)
The current hard-copy issue of New York Tails Magazine, which has been out and about for several weeks now, published a story called "NYCs Pit Bull Problem -- And Why You Care" by our wonderful writer/reporter Courtney Kistler. We've also been following this story in general since way back in May, because my nose for news told me to stay on the trail of this one.
Today, (September 23, 2009) the New York Times has covered the story.
Like I said, we can't break them all, but when we do, I admit I get some smug satisfaction out of it, especially if we're on top of it before the mainstream press. :)
Here is the article you can find in the current issue of New York Tails Magazine. (If you haven't subscribed yet, now is a great time to do so. Just visit our website at http://www.newyorktails.com/ to find out how.) We do distribute a limited number (very limited) number for free at various locations but we really depend on readers like you, much like public television or NPR, for support.
We are an entirely volunteer operation. And remember, New York Tails Magazine is the ONLY local pet news publication and has been serving you since 2002. Please help us continue to do so by subscribing today.
So, without further ado:
New York City’s Pit Bull Problem – And Why YOU Care
Written by Courtney Kistler
Edited By Diane West
Large dogs are a common in New York City’s projects, but a new provision may change that. Residents and others speak out about how this new law will change, or has already changed, their lives and the lives of their dogs. But citywide, New York City’s already overburdened shelter system may feel the effects of a flood of these now ‘banned’ dogs being surrendered by New York City Housing Authority residents (NYCHA) who fear of losing their apartments.
East River Houses resident Samuel* walked
his two Rottweilers, ‘Addy’ and ‘Nelson’, from
105th Street and First Avenue to another
nearby development, the George Washington
Houses, one recent summer afternoon. Once
there, he let the two large, seemingly tame
dogs off their leashes for some exercise in
the courtyard. Almost immediately, a woman
begins arguing with him. She is afraid of the
dogs and demands Samuel put them back
on their leashes.
Samuel refuses. His dogs have never hurt
anyone, he tells the angry woman, and they’re
under control. After a few more minutes of
arguing she walks away cursing.
“I can’t win,” Samuel shrugs. By his own
admission, he is an intimidating sight. Sixfoot
five, dark skinned, tattooed, and flanked
by two large dogs, he says he’s an ‘easy target’
for both public housing residents and police
officers alike.
“Kids as young as ten years old, looking to
become Crips or Bloods, flash red or blue
bandanas and threaten to ‘blast’ me because
they think I’m a cop. And the cops? They
think I’m fighting my dogs and doing other
bad things, and they won’t leave me alone.”
Add to the kids and the police one more
group who will have Samuel and other public
housing residents under a more watchful
eye-The New York City Housing Authority
(NYCHA).
On May 1st, the Housing Authority, which
is responsible for overseeing some 178,489
apartments throughout five boroughs,
imposed a 25-pound weight limit on family
dogs, almost half of the 40-pound weight
limit instituted seven years ago. Additionally,
the new rule specifically bans pit bulls,
Rottweilers, and Doberman Pinchers from
public housing, period. Residents may either
have one pet dog or one pet cat but not both.
All pets living with public housing residents
must be registered with NYCHA. And, like all
dogs in the city, they must also be licensed.
“Dangerous Dogs”
The new weight and breed rules do not apply
to service dogs or to residents of Section 8
subsidized apartments, which NYCHA does
not manage. But those who have had dogs
over 40 pounds since 2002 and did not
register them with the housing authority
at that time may now face eviction. Some
residents have already been told to remove
their dogs.
“Over the years, we had been getting an
increasing number of complaints about
problems associated with dangerous dogs;
dogs that are used for fighting, dogs that
are attack dogs, and dogs that are not
being handled and trained properly by their
owners,” says NYCHA spokesman Howard
Marder when asked what prompted this
latest change.
Many New Yorkers, NYCHA and non-NYCHA
residents alike, were taken aback by the public
housing authority’s seeming haste to put
the new weight and breed bans into effect.
In addition to some initial glaring missteps,
like the publication of a list containing the
names of 27 so-called ‘dangerous breeds’
(which included the likes of Boston Terriers)
the new rules seemed to contradict a New
York State law which has long prohibited
state municipalities from making laws which
ban the ownership of specific dog breeds.
To that, Mr. Marder says, “NYCHA is not a
municipality. Therefore the rule does not
apply.” However, he says, NYCHA met with
city animal advocacy organizations prior
to implementing the new rule because “we
didn’t take [this] change lightly.”
Residents, Animal Groups Taken By
Surprise
“In no way shape or form did they [the
Housing Authority] consult with us prior to
coming up with this list, and we categorically
reject breed discriminatory legislation,”
says an angry Jane Hoffman, President of
the Mayor’s Alliance For NYC's Animals and
founding member and Chair of the NYC
Bar Association Committee on Legal Issues
Pertaining to Animals. “They only put out a
notice to their tenants about a month before
May 1st, and it came to our attention when
residents started calling us in a panic.”
The Mayor’s Alliance and other city animal
rescue organizations have a strong interest
in the potential repercussions of NYCHA’s
weight-and-breed ban. Since its founding
in 2002, the Mayor's Alliance has been the
recipient of millions of dollars in grant money
from Maddie's Fund, a national animal resuce
fund created by software developer David
Duffield in memory of the family's Schnauzer,
Maddie. The Mayor's Alliance anticipates
spending (and raising) a total of $24.4 million
by 2016 to help reach their stated objective:
reaching the day "when no New York City dog
or cat of reasonable health and temperament
is killed merely because he or she does not
have a home.”
“We are concerned from a policy standpoint,
as we’re trying to make New York a no-kill
city,” Ms. Hoffman says “We knew this [NYCHA]
policy would cause an increase in shelter
intake and the 25-pound weight limit would
make it difficult for public housing residents
to adopt from Animal Care and Control
(AC&C). Seventy percent of dogs who come
into the shelter system, according ot the
AC&C website, are pit bulls--one of the three
breeds now banned from NYCHA projects.
The Domino Effect
It is impossible to say exactly how many
animals have already ended up at the AC&C,
the city’s animal shelter system, as a result of
the new NYCHA rules. But if early predictions
are correct, the number of dogs turned in
could be substantial.
According to Debora Bresch, ASPCA's
Legislative Liaison in Government Relations,
six percent of all dogs available for adoption
from the AC&C were adopted by public
housing residents between January and April
2009, a total of about 172 dogs. Under the May
1st NYCHA rules, 107 of these 172 dogs - over
60% - are not supposed to be there, making
them prime candidates to be returned to
the city’s shelter system.
Early attempts to discourage city housing residents from
surrendering their animals before knowing
what their rights are under the new rules
include the distribution of a memo in several
languages at each of the city’s shelters. (The
English version of the memo can be accessed
here: http://www.animalalliancenyc.org/
press/memo2009-06-08-English.pdf )
There were 4,656 dogs and 1,264 cats
registered as pets of housing authority
residents when the May 1st policy went into
effect but, Mr. Marder says, NYCHA did not
keep records of them by breed. However, he
says, NYCHA will use its “limited resources to
address lease violations such as this as well
as all other lease violations or Quality Of Life
infringements or crimes as it is made aware
of them.”
Pit Bulls In the Projects
Public housing residents are among the first
to admit pit bull fighting and animal abuse
are common within certain housing projects
and must be stopped. But several interviewed
for this article feel the new NYCHA rule is too
broad and unfairly affects people and pets
who never have, nor would, do anything
criminal with animals.
One of those fighting against NYCHA’s new
pet rule is 26 year-old Marquis Jenkins,
community organizer for a tenant advocacy
group called the Good Old Lower East Side
(GOLES). Mr. Jenkins has been circulating
and gathering thousands of signatures for a
petition against the new policy. At the crux
of his efforts is a request that NYCHA “halt
any and all evictions in association with the
[new] pet policy”.
Supported by Councilwoman Rosie Mendez,
Chair of the New York City Council’s
Subcommittee on Public Housing, Mr. Jenkins
asserts that nearly all the dog owners that
have joined the fight against the policy with
GOLES have received a letter from NYCHA--
the first step of the eviction process. Some
have refused NYCHA management’s request
to remove their pets. Their next step is to
schedule a hearing at the NYCHA head offices
at 250 Broadway.
Back uptown at the George Washington
Houses, 70 year-old resident Gladys and her
seven year-old pit bull, “Dream”, say they’ve
had run-ins with NYCHA long before the May
1st rule went into effect. When Dream was still
a puppy, Gladys says, a resident complained
to the Housing Authority that Gladys’ dog
was vicious. Gladys found herself not only
having to prove allegation false in order to
keep Dream, but to keep her apartment as
well.
“So I took pictures of her
playing with people, with children, and I got
a petition, because all [the] people are crazy
about her.” Eventually, NYCHA ruled in her
favor. A public housing resident for 38 years,
Gladys says she’s received a written notice in
the mail regarding the pet policy change but
is unconcerned. Dream is registered, spayed,
with vet certification, and although over 40
pounds, is exempt from the weight limits
because she is considered a type of service/
therapy dog for Gladys.
Gladys says she took Dream as a four-month old
puppy from her niece, because “I didn’t
want her to fall into the wrong hands. My niece
was being offered hundreds of dollars for this
puppy.” People willing to purchase Dream at
such a large price, she believes, were looking
to either breed her or use her for fighting – or
both.
Gladys’ friend, Moncit*, agrees. She’s
witnessed firsthand what she believes were
people training dogs for fighting.
“Last Summer, right there,” Moncit recounts,
pointing to a large tree in the courtyard, “is
where I saw a rope hanging. A pit bull was
holding onto it with his jaws, swinging from
this rope, while a man was whipping it with
his belt over and over again.
“This used to be a breeding ground for pit
bulls,” says Marietta, who has lived in public
housing for 52 years and currently lives at
the Washington Houses. Up until about two
years ago, she says, the problem was easy to
see. “They used to fight dogs wherever – it
did not matter. In the street, on the sidewalk,
right here in this yard,” she says. She is
standing in front of the same area Samuel
had let his Rottweilers run earlier that day.
The housing authority’s ban on pit bulls and
other breeds often favored by dog fighters
does have some unlikely supporters, however.
One of them is Emelinda Navarez, a life-long
resident of the South Bronx and founder of
Earth Angels Canine Rescue. Over 45 years, Ms.
Navarez estimates she’s rescued over 6,000
pit bulls in and around her neighborhood.
Another is Stacy Alldredge, a Chelsea
resident who has a dog training business
and has worked at animal shelters as well as
been involved in animal rescue for more than
two decades. Both Emelinda in the Bronx and
Stacy in Chelsea think the NYCHA ban on pit
bulls may be the right thing to do.
Other advocates, who don’t support the ban,
nonetheless acknowledge there is a problem,
problems which have not necessarily ceased
since implementation of the new policy.
On July 8th, police called to check out a
disturbance at the Stanley Isaacs Houses East
94th Street shot and killed a pit bull during
the melee, according to a Daily News report.
Weeks later, a 19 year-old boy was arrested
for throwing a young pit-bull mix off a roof in
Brooklyn’s Red Hook housing development.
And on September 29th, a trial will begin
against seven men who were arrested during
a police raid of an East 179th Street building
where the basement and yard was allegedly
used to carry out an organized dog fighting
operation. (See the homepage for the NYC
Anti-animal Fighting Campaign (http://
stopdogfightingnownyc.wetpaint.com) for
more details.)
As residents have attested, there is no
doubt that mistreatment, recklessness, and
irresponsible behavior when it comes to
animals in public housing take place and
causes quality of life issues. Whether or not
the NYCHA ban on pit bulls, Rottweilers,
Dobermans, and dogs over 25 pounds will
put a damper on these things, which have
created the problems that Mr. Marder says
residents have complained about, remains to
be seen. As the 90 day grace period has just
past, New York Tails will keep a close eye on
NYCHA’s enforcement of its new policy and
its effect on the city shelter system, as well as
progress by those who are part of the effort
to repeal the rule.
As for Addy and Nelson, just a few weeks after
being interviewed for this article, Samuel
relinquished the pair to Manhattan AC&C on
110th Street, saying that he is trying to save
up money to move away from New York and
cannot do so while also providing for the
animals. Luckily, the pair were removed from
the shelter by a Rottweiler rescue group and
eventually found a new home in Vermont.
Only first names of public housing residents have
been provided to protect their privacy.
Next week: Animal advocates Emerlinda Navarez and Stacy Alldredge, from two very different parts of the city, explain why the large breed dog ban in the projects may ultimately end up protecting the dogs.
Past Coverage:
May 12, 2009
Exclusive Interview: NYCHA On the Pit Bull and Other Large Dog Ban In Public Housing
http://newyorktails.blogspot.com/2009/06/first-nycha-casualties-begin-to-show-up.html
June 10th, 2009
First NYCHA ‘Casualties’ Begin to Show Up At City Shelters – New York Tails Magazine Investigation Underway
http://newyorktails.blogspot.com/2009/06/first-nycha-casualties-begin-to-show-up.html
Wave of Dog Surrenders Possible In Wake of NYCHA Dog Breed/Weight Ban (June 24th, 2009) http://newyorktails.blogspot.com/2009/06/wave-of-dog-surrenders-possible-in-wake.html
May 12, 2009
Exclusive Interview: NYCHA On the Pit Bull and Other Large Dog Ban In Public Housing
http://newyorktails.blogspot.com/2009/06/first-nycha-casualties-begin-to-show-up.html
June 10th, 2009
First NYCHA ‘Casualties’ Begin to Show Up At City Shelters – New York Tails Magazine Investigation Underway
http://newyorktails.blogspot.com/2009/06/first-nycha-casualties-begin-to-show-up.html
Wave of Dog Surrenders Possible In Wake of NYCHA Dog Breed/Weight Ban (June 24th, 2009)
http://newyorktails.blogspot.com/2009/06/wave-of-dog-surrenders-possible-in-wake.html
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Pit Bulls (and other large dogs) In the Projects -- Once Again, New York Tails Scoops the Competition
Saturday, September 19, 2009
A Shelter in Every Borough? State Supreme Court Says So
Now THIS is an interesting story on a number of levels! I'll just recap briefly here and let the court papers and press releases speak for themselves with maybe a snarky comment from me here and there.
Brief recap: for some time, one of my favorite rescue groups in New York, Stray from the Heart (I love them all, but there are a few that stand out) has been petitioning the city to, in short, obey and implement it's own law. That law (ordinance, what have you) introduced almost ten years ago pretty much said that each of the city's five boroughs had to provide shelters for dogs and cats throughout the city. Currently there are only three: Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Staten Island. Queens and the Bronx have 'intake shelters' where animals are pretty much dropped off but no full facility--including a place where people can meet and possibly adopt them--exists.
Long story short, Stray From the Heart (SFTH) took the city to task to obey it's own law in this regard. The city (and in this case it would be the Department of Health primarily, which oversees Animal Care and Control) balked with a number of excuses, from interpretation of the law to SFTH's standing as to bring such a point to court.
Well, guess what? As of late last week the New York State Supreme Court ruled that, yes, indeed, DoH, you have to obey the law and you have 60 days to come up with how you're planning to do it!
This story has many interesting, moving parts. Of course the main subject is in itself interesting, but consider these extra factoids as well:
1.) Here's the recent court order, which gives a pretty good recap of the issue. The document you really want to read is the one from September--that will get you up-to-speed one what's transpired since January of this year between SFTH and the DoH. Kudos to the Parke Avenue law firm of Kaye Scholer LLP, by the way, for taking on the city. No matter which way your opinion sways, that does take a pair of eggs.
2.) Note that on the court order you'll see Dr. Thomas R. Frieden named as a Defendant in the case. Interesting on two fronts: number one, Dr. Frieden was appointed by President Obama as head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention back in May 2009. So he's got other things to do. Secondly, however, now that I think about it--don't you think as part of the 'vetting process' when Obama makes an appointment that stuff like this comes out, ie, that you are a named defendant in a rather serious case that involves whether you are obeying the law? Sheeh, other potential members of the President's men (and women) have been torpedoed for less, no? Yet the mainstream press let that one slide.
3.) The job of new 'defendant' in this case falls to another Tom, Thomas Farley, who is now head of the NYC Department of Health 'and Mental Hygiene' (what, by the way, does that mean? Brain flossing?) Ironically, he started his career at the CDC, which Frieden now heads, and specializes in infectious diseases. My favorite job title for him that he'd held in the past was 'Epidemic Intelligence Officer.' I'm not kidding, look at the bio. This may come in handy if New York gets hit with the H1n1 flu ("swine flu") this season. Who knows what those nasty microbes are planning--maybe they are even hiding weapons of mass destruction.
4.) As you read here first, the head of the AC&C, Charlene Pedrolie, will no longer be the head of the AC&C come mid-October. If the city is supposed to come up with a plan for how it will obey it's own pet sheltering rule 60 days from the court order that brings us to, what, mid-November or so? (Maybe Charlene is getting out just in time; as I write this, there are a number of names being bandied about for her replacement.) In any event, there's going to be lots and lots of activity going on at the city's shelter system/s in the next two months, so stay tuned.
Give the links above a click and let me know what you think of all of this.
Brief recap: for some time, one of my favorite rescue groups in New York, Stray from the Heart (I love them all, but there are a few that stand out) has been petitioning the city to, in short, obey and implement it's own law. That law (ordinance, what have you) introduced almost ten years ago pretty much said that each of the city's five boroughs had to provide shelters for dogs and cats throughout the city. Currently there are only three: Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Staten Island. Queens and the Bronx have 'intake shelters' where animals are pretty much dropped off but no full facility--including a place where people can meet and possibly adopt them--exists.
Long story short, Stray From the Heart (SFTH) took the city to task to obey it's own law in this regard. The city (and in this case it would be the Department of Health primarily, which oversees Animal Care and Control) balked with a number of excuses, from interpretation of the law to SFTH's standing as to bring such a point to court.
Well, guess what? As of late last week the New York State Supreme Court ruled that, yes, indeed, DoH, you have to obey the law and you have 60 days to come up with how you're planning to do it!
This story has many interesting, moving parts. Of course the main subject is in itself interesting, but consider these extra factoids as well:
1.) Here's the recent court order, which gives a pretty good recap of the issue. The document you really want to read is the one from September--that will get you up-to-speed one what's transpired since January of this year between SFTH and the DoH. Kudos to the Parke Avenue law firm of Kaye Scholer LLP, by the way, for taking on the city. No matter which way your opinion sways, that does take a pair of eggs.
2.) Note that on the court order you'll see Dr. Thomas R. Frieden named as a Defendant in the case. Interesting on two fronts: number one, Dr. Frieden was appointed by President Obama as head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention back in May 2009. So he's got other things to do. Secondly, however, now that I think about it--don't you think as part of the 'vetting process' when Obama makes an appointment that stuff like this comes out, ie, that you are a named defendant in a rather serious case that involves whether you are obeying the law? Sheeh, other potential members of the President's men (and women) have been torpedoed for less, no? Yet the mainstream press let that one slide.
3.) The job of new 'defendant' in this case falls to another Tom, Thomas Farley, who is now head of the NYC Department of Health 'and Mental Hygiene' (what, by the way, does that mean? Brain flossing?) Ironically, he started his career at the CDC, which Frieden now heads, and specializes in infectious diseases. My favorite job title for him that he'd held in the past was 'Epidemic Intelligence Officer.' I'm not kidding, look at the bio. This may come in handy if New York gets hit with the H1n1 flu ("swine flu") this season. Who knows what those nasty microbes are planning--maybe they are even hiding weapons of mass destruction.
4.) As you read here first, the head of the AC&C, Charlene Pedrolie, will no longer be the head of the AC&C come mid-October. If the city is supposed to come up with a plan for how it will obey it's own pet sheltering rule 60 days from the court order that brings us to, what, mid-November or so? (Maybe Charlene is getting out just in time; as I write this, there are a number of names being bandied about for her replacement.) In any event, there's going to be lots and lots of activity going on at the city's shelter system/s in the next two months, so stay tuned.
Give the links above a click and let me know what you think of all of this.
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Rabies Alert -- Yes, Even In Manhattan!
Dog owners in particular (and those who let their cats go in and out of the house) -- head's up. There definitely must have been some kind of bumper crop of raccoons this year, I must have ran across (almost literally sometimes!) a dozen this summer in Central Park, right near the Bridle Path/Reservoir edges. Makes sense--perfect meeting of leafy trees and a large water source, and an occassional discarded sandwich or power bar from the garbage.
Definately a time to use some judgement when letting dogs off-leash in a wooded area,, especially at night, and if you are taking care of a feral cat colony or have an indoor-outdoor cat.
Generally racoons and bats and other nocturnal beasties remain just that--nocturnal. If you see them meandering around during the daytime that is a good indication they may be sick. Stay away.
Direct link located at:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/pr2009/pr056-09.shtml
Health Department Reminds New Yorkers to Avoid Wild Animals and to Vaccinate their Pets against Rabies
Second rabid raccoon recently identified in Manhattan
August 28, 2009 – With the identification of a second raccoon infected with rabies in Manhattan in recent weeks, the Health Department is reminding New Yorkers to stay away from raccoons, skunks, bats, stray dogs and cats and other wild animals that can carry rabies. 12 rabid animals have been identified in New York City this year. Eight were found in the Bronx, two in Manhattan (most recently in Central Park), one in Queens (Long Island City) and one in Staten Island (Tottenville). Raccoons are the most commonly reported rabid animals in New York City. Rabid raccoons are a relatively common occurrence in Staten Island and the Bronx, but rare in Queens and Manhattan. Bats with rabies have also been found in all five boroughs.
People and unvaccinated animals can get rabies, most often through a bite from an infected animal. Infection leads to a severe brain disease that causes death unless the person is treated promptly after being bitten. To reduce the risk of rabies, New Yorkers should avoid all wild animals, as well as any animal that seems sick, disoriented or unusually placid or aggressive. Report such animals by calling 311. Animals that have attacked or may attack should be reported to 911.
In 2008, 19 animals tested positive for rabies in New York City. They included 13 from the Bronx (4 raccoons, 7 skunks, 1 bat and 1 cat) and 4 from Staten Island Staten Island (all raccoons), as well as a bat from Brooklyn and a raccoon from Queens.
To protect yourself against rabies:
Do not touch or feed wild animals, or stray dogs or cats.
Keep garbage in tightly sealed containers.
Stay away from any animal that is behaving aggressively or a wild animal that appears ill or is acting unusually friendly. Call 311 or your local precinct to report the animal.
If you find a bat indoors that may have had contact with someone, do not release it before calling 311 to determine whether it should be tested. For information on how to safely capture a bat, visit http://www.health.state.ny.us/diseases/communicable/zoonoses/rabies/.
To protect your pet against rabies:
Make sure your dog or cat is up-to-date on rabies vaccinations.
Do not leave your pets outdoors unattended.
Do not try to separate animals that are fighting.
If your pet has been in contact with an animal that might be rabid, contact your veterinarian, and report the incident to 311.
Feed pets indoors.
If you are bitten by an animal:
Immediately wash the wound with lots of soap and water.
Seek medical care from your health care provider.
If you know where the animal is, call 311 to have it captured.
If the animal is a pet, get the owner’s name, address and telephone number to give to the Health Department so they can ensure the animal is not rabid.
Call the Animal Bite Unit (212-676-2483) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., or file a report online at www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/vet/vetegp.shtml.
For information about medical follow-up, call 311 or your medical provider.
For more information about rabies in New York City, visit www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/vet/vet5.shtml.
Definately a time to use some judgement when letting dogs off-leash in a wooded area,, especially at night, and if you are taking care of a feral cat colony or have an indoor-outdoor cat.
Generally racoons and bats and other nocturnal beasties remain just that--nocturnal. If you see them meandering around during the daytime that is a good indication they may be sick. Stay away.
Direct link located at:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/pr2009/pr056-09.shtml
Health Department Reminds New Yorkers to Avoid Wild Animals and to Vaccinate their Pets against Rabies
Second rabid raccoon recently identified in Manhattan
August 28, 2009 – With the identification of a second raccoon infected with rabies in Manhattan in recent weeks, the Health Department is reminding New Yorkers to stay away from raccoons, skunks, bats, stray dogs and cats and other wild animals that can carry rabies. 12 rabid animals have been identified in New York City this year. Eight were found in the Bronx, two in Manhattan (most recently in Central Park), one in Queens (Long Island City) and one in Staten Island (Tottenville). Raccoons are the most commonly reported rabid animals in New York City. Rabid raccoons are a relatively common occurrence in Staten Island and the Bronx, but rare in Queens and Manhattan. Bats with rabies have also been found in all five boroughs.
People and unvaccinated animals can get rabies, most often through a bite from an infected animal. Infection leads to a severe brain disease that causes death unless the person is treated promptly after being bitten. To reduce the risk of rabies, New Yorkers should avoid all wild animals, as well as any animal that seems sick, disoriented or unusually placid or aggressive. Report such animals by calling 311. Animals that have attacked or may attack should be reported to 911.
In 2008, 19 animals tested positive for rabies in New York City. They included 13 from the Bronx (4 raccoons, 7 skunks, 1 bat and 1 cat) and 4 from Staten Island Staten Island (all raccoons), as well as a bat from Brooklyn and a raccoon from Queens.
To protect yourself against rabies:
Do not touch or feed wild animals, or stray dogs or cats.
Keep garbage in tightly sealed containers.
Stay away from any animal that is behaving aggressively or a wild animal that appears ill or is acting unusually friendly. Call 311 or your local precinct to report the animal.
If you find a bat indoors that may have had contact with someone, do not release it before calling 311 to determine whether it should be tested. For information on how to safely capture a bat, visit http://www.health.state.ny.us/diseases/communicable/zoonoses/rabies/.
To protect your pet against rabies:
Make sure your dog or cat is up-to-date on rabies vaccinations.
Do not leave your pets outdoors unattended.
Do not try to separate animals that are fighting.
If your pet has been in contact with an animal that might be rabid, contact your veterinarian, and report the incident to 311.
Feed pets indoors.
If you are bitten by an animal:
Immediately wash the wound with lots of soap and water.
Seek medical care from your health care provider.
If you know where the animal is, call 311 to have it captured.
If the animal is a pet, get the owner’s name, address and telephone number to give to the Health Department so they can ensure the animal is not rabid.
Call the Animal Bite Unit (212-676-2483) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., or file a report online at www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/vet/vetegp.shtml.
For information about medical follow-up, call 311 or your medical provider.
For more information about rabies in New York City, visit www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/vet/vet5.shtml.
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Vet Bills Tax Deductible? Maybe with the HAPPY Bill!
Hey! Look at the press release I just got from the National Association of Professional Pet Sitters (NAPPS). In truth, a staff member gave me a head's up about this several days prior and I've just been too busy to research. But wanted to let you guys know about this. I know it would help me out! After years of joking about it perhaps it might become a reality. (Long way off, of course, and many auxillary issues attached such as the old 'pets as property or family' debate, but the fact it was even introduced is progress.)
The National Association of Professional Pet Sitters Applauds Rep. McCotter's 'HAPPY' Bill
Date:
Tue, Aug 25, 2009 12:07 pm
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Aug. 25, 2009
The National Association of Professional Pet Sitters Applauds Rep. McCotter’s ‘HAPPY’ Bill
MOUNT LAUREL, N.J. – The National Association of Professional Pet Sitters (NAPPS), the nation’s leading nonprofit professional pet sitting organization, applauds Congressman Thaddeus McCotter’s efforts to pass a bill to make pet care expenses tax-deductible.
Introduced on July 31, HR 3501, commonly referred to as the Humanity and Pets Partnered Through the Years or HAPPY Act, would amend the IRS code to allow an individual to deduct up to $3500 in a taxable year for qualified pet care expenses. The bill defines qualified as “amounts paid in connection with providing care (including veterinary care) for a qualified pet expense other than any expense in connection with the acquisition of the qualified pet.”
The bill further defines a qualified pet as a “legally owned, domesticated, live animal” and does not include animals used for research or owned or used in conjunction with trade or business.
“This bill will provide pet owners the opportunity to deduct pet care expenses ensuring adequate veterinary care for their pets,” said NAPPS President Monica Leighton, owner of Professional Pet Sitting in Venice, Fla. “During these hard economic times, this legislation is essential because it encourages responsible pet ownership and will potentially reduce the number of pets that are abandoned due to the lack of resources. We encourage all animal lovers to contact their members of Congress and voice their support for HR 3501.”
The bill, which has been referred to the House Ways and Means Committee, can be viewed at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.3501.IH.
NAPPS is dedicated to promoting the welfare of animals. The Association aims to help the pet owning public by fulfilling its vision statement, “To be the most respected authority in professional pet sitting.” It does so by providing the tools and support to foster the success of its members. Additionally, pet owners can benefit from NAPPS’ free resources including a disaster preparedness guide, tips on how to select a pet sitter, nationwide referral service, and quarterly teleconferences aimed to educate the pet owning public.
For more information about NAPPS, please visit www.petsitters.org.
The National Association of Professional Pet Sitters Applauds Rep. McCotter's 'HAPPY' Bill
Date:
Tue, Aug 25, 2009 12:07 pm
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Aug. 25, 2009
The National Association of Professional Pet Sitters Applauds Rep. McCotter’s ‘HAPPY’ Bill
MOUNT LAUREL, N.J. – The National Association of Professional Pet Sitters (NAPPS), the nation’s leading nonprofit professional pet sitting organization, applauds Congressman Thaddeus McCotter’s efforts to pass a bill to make pet care expenses tax-deductible.
Introduced on July 31, HR 3501, commonly referred to as the Humanity and Pets Partnered Through the Years or HAPPY Act, would amend the IRS code to allow an individual to deduct up to $3500 in a taxable year for qualified pet care expenses. The bill defines qualified as “amounts paid in connection with providing care (including veterinary care) for a qualified pet expense other than any expense in connection with the acquisition of the qualified pet.”
The bill further defines a qualified pet as a “legally owned, domesticated, live animal” and does not include animals used for research or owned or used in conjunction with trade or business.
“This bill will provide pet owners the opportunity to deduct pet care expenses ensuring adequate veterinary care for their pets,” said NAPPS President Monica Leighton, owner of Professional Pet Sitting in Venice, Fla. “During these hard economic times, this legislation is essential because it encourages responsible pet ownership and will potentially reduce the number of pets that are abandoned due to the lack of resources. We encourage all animal lovers to contact their members of Congress and voice their support for HR 3501.”
The bill, which has been referred to the House Ways and Means Committee, can be viewed at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.3501.IH.
NAPPS is dedicated to promoting the welfare of animals. The Association aims to help the pet owning public by fulfilling its vision statement, “To be the most respected authority in professional pet sitting.” It does so by providing the tools and support to foster the success of its members. Additionally, pet owners can benefit from NAPPS’ free resources including a disaster preparedness guide, tips on how to select a pet sitter, nationwide referral service, and quarterly teleconferences aimed to educate the pet owning public.
For more information about NAPPS, please visit www.petsitters.org.
Monday, August 24, 2009
okay, so I was a little off about Pennsylvania
the puppy-mill puppies came in today via North Shore and others. Says 'from the midwest.' All small-type breeds. Usually these get snatched up the quickest.
150 Dogs Begin New Lives Following Puppy Mill Rescue
PORT WASHINGTON, N.Y. (Monday, Aug. 24 , 2009)—Approximately 150 cast-off puppy mill dogs from a number of Midwest states are safe today after being delivered to local rescue groups in the New York area. After thorough medical evaluations, much-needed grooming, and a lot of TLC, they eventually will be available for adoption through local rescue groups.
After a long, cross-country journey, they were delivered this morning to waiting groups here at North Shore Animal League America in Port Washington by Best Friends Animal Society, which arranged for the release and provided transport of the dogs. In addition to North Shore Animal League, three other animal welfare organizations—Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons, Wainscott, N.Y.; Mt. Pleasant Animal Shelter, East Hanover, N.J.; and Noah’s Ark Animal Welfare Association, Ledgewood, N.J.—will provide homes for the dogs until they are adopted.
The rescued dogs included adults used for breeding, adolescents and puppies of various breeds, such as cocker spaniels, Yorkies, Maltese, poodles, Pomeranians, shih tzus, shelties and Jack Russell terriers. Dogs such as these are typically killed or sold at mill dog auctions for as little as 25 cents because they are considered unsalable. Instead, they will get a new chance for happy lives.
Joanne Yohannan, senior vice president of operations for North Shore Animal League America, said the rescued animals would be given time to settle in, and will be fed and hydrated after their long journey.
“We first must get the dogs feeling safe and comfortable in their new environment,” Ms. Yohannan said. “Then our staff experts will begin the process of evaluating each animal. These dogs will experience the nurturing and warmth of human contact that they have been deprived of all their lives, which will prepare them for adoption into the loving homes they deserve.
“Rather than being needlessly killed because they were no longer wanted by their breeders, some beautiful dogs are about to begin a new and exciting phase of their lives,” said Kelli Ohrtman, campaign specialist for Best Friends Animal Society, which funded the rescue of the dogs to the New York area through its “Pup My Ride” transportation program.
The rescue and transport of the dogs are part of Best Friends Animal Society’s “Puppies Aren’t Products” national campaign (puppiesarentproducts.com), which also targets the retail end of the puppy mill industry through informational demonstrations at New York puppy emporiums. Since 2008, the peaceful pet store demonstrations have caused some stores to only offer for sale pets that come from rescue groups and shelters.
“Puppy mill dogs comprise a significant percentage of the 4-5 million pets that die in American shelters annually”, said Ohrtman. “The mission of Best Friends Animal Society is to bring about a time when there are no more homeless pets. It’s what the public wants and the pet trade industry must change dramatically or it will become a relic of the past.”
Ms. Yohannan said that the Animal League will announce later in the week when the animals will be available for adoption and advised interested individuals to visit the Animal League website, www.AnimalLeague.org for details.
“Once our staff experts have determined that the dogs are ready for adoption, we will be eager to find the perfect homes for each and every one of these wonderful dogs,” said Ms. Yohannan.
150 Dogs Begin New Lives Following Puppy Mill Rescue
PORT WASHINGTON, N.Y. (Monday, Aug. 24 , 2009)—Approximately 150 cast-off puppy mill dogs from a number of Midwest states are safe today after being delivered to local rescue groups in the New York area. After thorough medical evaluations, much-needed grooming, and a lot of TLC, they eventually will be available for adoption through local rescue groups.
After a long, cross-country journey, they were delivered this morning to waiting groups here at North Shore Animal League America in Port Washington by Best Friends Animal Society, which arranged for the release and provided transport of the dogs. In addition to North Shore Animal League, three other animal welfare organizations—Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons, Wainscott, N.Y.; Mt. Pleasant Animal Shelter, East Hanover, N.J.; and Noah’s Ark Animal Welfare Association, Ledgewood, N.J.—will provide homes for the dogs until they are adopted.
The rescued dogs included adults used for breeding, adolescents and puppies of various breeds, such as cocker spaniels, Yorkies, Maltese, poodles, Pomeranians, shih tzus, shelties and Jack Russell terriers. Dogs such as these are typically killed or sold at mill dog auctions for as little as 25 cents because they are considered unsalable. Instead, they will get a new chance for happy lives.
Joanne Yohannan, senior vice president of operations for North Shore Animal League America, said the rescued animals would be given time to settle in, and will be fed and hydrated after their long journey.
“We first must get the dogs feeling safe and comfortable in their new environment,” Ms. Yohannan said. “Then our staff experts will begin the process of evaluating each animal. These dogs will experience the nurturing and warmth of human contact that they have been deprived of all their lives, which will prepare them for adoption into the loving homes they deserve.
“Rather than being needlessly killed because they were no longer wanted by their breeders, some beautiful dogs are about to begin a new and exciting phase of their lives,” said Kelli Ohrtman, campaign specialist for Best Friends Animal Society, which funded the rescue of the dogs to the New York area through its “Pup My Ride” transportation program.
The rescue and transport of the dogs are part of Best Friends Animal Society’s “Puppies Aren’t Products” national campaign (puppiesarentproducts.com), which also targets the retail end of the puppy mill industry through informational demonstrations at New York puppy emporiums. Since 2008, the peaceful pet store demonstrations have caused some stores to only offer for sale pets that come from rescue groups and shelters.
“Puppy mill dogs comprise a significant percentage of the 4-5 million pets that die in American shelters annually”, said Ohrtman. “The mission of Best Friends Animal Society is to bring about a time when there are no more homeless pets. It’s what the public wants and the pet trade industry must change dramatically or it will become a relic of the past.”
Ms. Yohannan said that the Animal League will announce later in the week when the animals will be available for adoption and advised interested individuals to visit the Animal League website, www.AnimalLeague.org for details.
“Once our staff experts have determined that the dogs are ready for adoption, we will be eager to find the perfect homes for each and every one of these wonderful dogs,” said Ms. Yohannan.
Okay, so I was a little off base re the Pennsylvania puppy mill rescue (I think)
WriteHeaderRow("From", msg.displayFrom);
WriteHeaderRow("To", msg.displayTo);
WriteHeaderRow("Cc", msg.displayCc);
WriteHeaderRow("Bcc", msg.displayBcc);
WriteHeaderRow("Subject", msg.subject);
WriteHeaderRow("Date", opener.ws.date.formatDateTime(new Date(msg.receivedTime), opener.Config.Strings.MsgViewDateFormat));
WriteHeaderAttachments("Attachments", msg.attachments);
From:
John Polis
To:
newyorktails@aol.com
Subject:
Rescued Dogs Arrive in New York
Date:
Mon, Aug 24, 2009 4:15 pm
document.write(msg.body);
NEWS RELEASE
150 Dogs Begin New Lives Following Puppy Mill Rescue
PORT WASHINGTON, N.Y. (Monday, Aug. 24 , 2009)—Approximately 150 cast-off puppy mill dogs from a number of Midwest states are safe today after being delivered to local rescue groups in the New York area. After thorough medical evaluations, much-needed grooming, and a lot of TLC, they eventually will be available for adoption through local rescue groups.
After a long, cross-country journey, they were delivered this morning to waiting groups here at North Shore Animal League America in Port Washington by Best Friends Animal Society, which arranged for the release and provided transport of the dogs. In addition to North Shore Animal League, three other animal welfare organizations—Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons, Wainscott, N.Y.; Mt. Pleasant Animal Shelter, East Hanover, N.J.; and Noah’s Ark Animal Welfare Association, Ledgewood, N.J.—will provide homes for the dogs until they are adopted.
The rescued dogs included adults used for breeding, adolescents and puppies of various breeds, such as cocker spaniels, Yorkies, Maltese, poodles, Pomeranians, shih tzus, shelties and Jack Russell terriers. Dogs such as these are typically killed or sold at mill dog auctions for as little as 25 cents because they are considered unsalable. Instead, they will get a new chance for happy lives.
Joanne Yohannan, senior vice president of operations for North Shore Animal League America, said the rescued animals would be given time to settle in, and will be fed and hydrated after their long journey.
“We first must get the dogs feeling safe and comfortable in their new environment,” Ms. Yohannan said. “Then our staff experts will begin the process of evaluating each animal. These dogs will experience the nurturing and warmth of human contact that they have been deprived of all their lives, which will prepare them for adoption into the loving homes they deserve.
“Rather than being needlessly killed because they were no longer wanted by their breeders, some beautiful dogs are about to begin a new and exciting phase of their lives,” said Kelli Ohrtman, campaign specialist for Best Friends Animal Society, which funded the rescue of the dogs to the New York area through its “Pup My Ride” transportation program.
The rescue and transport of the dogs are part of Best Friends Animal Society’s “Puppies Aren’t Products” national campaign (puppiesarentproducts.com), which also targets the retail end of the puppy mill industry through informational demonstrations at New York puppy emporiums. Since 2008, the peaceful pet store demonstrations have caused some stores to only offer for sale pets that come from rescue groups and shelters.
“Puppy mill dogs comprise a significant percentage of the 4-5 million pets that die in American shelters annually”, said Ohrtman. “The mission of Best Friends Animal Society is to bring about a time when there are no more homeless pets. It’s what the public wants and the pet trade industry must change dramatically or it will become a relic of the past.”
Ms. Yohannan said that the Animal League will announce later in the week when the animals will be available for adoption and advised interested individuals to visit the Animal League website, www.AnimalLeague.org for details.
“Once our staff experts have determined that the dogs are ready for adoption, we will be eager to find the perfect homes for each and every one of these wonderful dogs,” said Ms. Yohannan.
WriteHeaderRow("To", msg.displayTo);
WriteHeaderRow("Cc", msg.displayCc);
WriteHeaderRow("Bcc", msg.displayBcc);
WriteHeaderRow("Subject", msg.subject);
WriteHeaderRow("Date", opener.ws.date.formatDateTime(new Date(msg.receivedTime), opener.Config.Strings.MsgViewDateFormat));
WriteHeaderAttachments("Attachments", msg.attachments);
From:
John Polis
To:
newyorktails@aol.com
Subject:
Rescued Dogs Arrive in New York
Date:
Mon, Aug 24, 2009 4:15 pm
document.write(msg.body);
NEWS RELEASE
150 Dogs Begin New Lives Following Puppy Mill Rescue
PORT WASHINGTON, N.Y. (Monday, Aug. 24 , 2009)—Approximately 150 cast-off puppy mill dogs from a number of Midwest states are safe today after being delivered to local rescue groups in the New York area. After thorough medical evaluations, much-needed grooming, and a lot of TLC, they eventually will be available for adoption through local rescue groups.
After a long, cross-country journey, they were delivered this morning to waiting groups here at North Shore Animal League America in Port Washington by Best Friends Animal Society, which arranged for the release and provided transport of the dogs. In addition to North Shore Animal League, three other animal welfare organizations—Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons, Wainscott, N.Y.; Mt. Pleasant Animal Shelter, East Hanover, N.J.; and Noah’s Ark Animal Welfare Association, Ledgewood, N.J.—will provide homes for the dogs until they are adopted.
The rescued dogs included adults used for breeding, adolescents and puppies of various breeds, such as cocker spaniels, Yorkies, Maltese, poodles, Pomeranians, shih tzus, shelties and Jack Russell terriers. Dogs such as these are typically killed or sold at mill dog auctions for as little as 25 cents because they are considered unsalable. Instead, they will get a new chance for happy lives.
Joanne Yohannan, senior vice president of operations for North Shore Animal League America, said the rescued animals would be given time to settle in, and will be fed and hydrated after their long journey.
“We first must get the dogs feeling safe and comfortable in their new environment,” Ms. Yohannan said. “Then our staff experts will begin the process of evaluating each animal. These dogs will experience the nurturing and warmth of human contact that they have been deprived of all their lives, which will prepare them for adoption into the loving homes they deserve.
“Rather than being needlessly killed because they were no longer wanted by their breeders, some beautiful dogs are about to begin a new and exciting phase of their lives,” said Kelli Ohrtman, campaign specialist for Best Friends Animal Society, which funded the rescue of the dogs to the New York area through its “Pup My Ride” transportation program.
The rescue and transport of the dogs are part of Best Friends Animal Society’s “Puppies Aren’t Products” national campaign (puppiesarentproducts.com), which also targets the retail end of the puppy mill industry through informational demonstrations at New York puppy emporiums. Since 2008, the peaceful pet store demonstrations have caused some stores to only offer for sale pets that come from rescue groups and shelters.
“Puppy mill dogs comprise a significant percentage of the 4-5 million pets that die in American shelters annually”, said Ohrtman. “The mission of Best Friends Animal Society is to bring about a time when there are no more homeless pets. It’s what the public wants and the pet trade industry must change dramatically or it will become a relic of the past.”
Ms. Yohannan said that the Animal League will announce later in the week when the animals will be available for adoption and advised interested individuals to visit the Animal League website, www.AnimalLeague.org for details.
“Once our staff experts have determined that the dogs are ready for adoption, we will be eager to find the perfect homes for each and every one of these wonderful dogs,” said Ms. Yohannan.
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Big Batch O'Pups Coming In To North Shore on Monday August 24
[NOTE: THIS IS AN OPINION PIECE BY DIANE WEST, ER, I MEAN MISTRESS CHILLI, OKAY? THANKS IN ADVANCE-- DW.]
...or, at least it will hit the media by then.
This is interesting, because they've been sort-of 'building up a buzz' about it for the past week or so, sending out a call for volunteers, and even the National Association of Pet Professionals put out a press release saying they're ready to help.
I tried to ask NSAL directly what's up, where the dogs are coming from, background, etc., but no luck. But I wonder if they're going to come from Pennsylvania. Wouldn't bet my life on it, but thinking they might because the Times just wrote this for pretty much no 'immediate' reason, just kind of reiterating old news (important news, but still old)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/us/18dogs.html?_r=1&emc=tnt&tntemail1=y
Almost seems like a 'prep story' so that when the 'big' puppy mill rescue story breaks it will look like they (the Times) are at least on top of the issue. (On top of the the topic?).
In any case, I've put it at the bottom of my extended commentary. They need volunteers, especially those in the pet profession like groomers, vets and vet techs, as well as the usual. All relevant contact information is at the bottom of this post.
I have to say when it comes to the puppy mill thing, and knowing that Lancaster, Pennsylvania is one of the hot spots, I am very saddened. What is not emphasized too much--perhaps for very sensitive reasons--is that a number of these puppy mill purveyors are Amish. Remember, the Amish are one of the fantastic anomalies of this century. They live simply with little to no 'modern' conveniences and in many cases are the last of the true subsidence farmers in the United States. They pay no taxes nor get or receive Social Security. In essence, they are following to the best of their ability their faith which tells them to be 'not in the world.'
But when things like this happen crime and punishment and whether you're subject to the earthly laws can get a little murky. Crime happens in Amish country, both by and against the Amish, just like anywhere else. Don't hear about it as much, obviously. And even amongst themselves they have different versions of being 'in' the world. For example, I happen to love 'Amish Country.' (I'm a city girl who every once in a while needs to be surrounded by nature, and when I do so, I go all the way.) Few years back Bill and I were staying in a farmhouse adjacent to a working Amish farm and low and behold--we see an Amish farmer using an 18th century plow (oxen and all!) talking on a cell phone at the same time! Mind freak, indeed! So we asked our hosts whazzup wit dat? And they told us, well, cell phones are allowed because they are not connected to power lines, which are connected to 'the world', etc. Okay, so they found a loophole. To this day Bill still argues with me about that and how that is 'cheating.' Ehh...
Anyway...what was I talking about again? Oh yes, puppy mills in Amish country (and again, not all puppy mills in Amish country are run by the Amish, just happens to be a lot of open space there and a convenient location a few hours drive from a number of major cities.) But when they are run by the Amish, I get very sad. I'm not shy to say that I'm Christian (a very, VERY liberal, VERY poor excuse for one who cringes everytime I see wackozoid Fundies representing all of us--they don't.) I do identify with the basic tenants of the faith, so perhaps it is not for me to judge. But it would seem that one of our pillars of faith is to be 'Good Shepards' of the earth and all of creation; one of Jesus' most beloved parables is the shepherd who goes out of his way to retrieve the one lost sheep, and in other parables He speaks at length about reaping and sowing. Obviously these are not to be taken literally, but it shows that to the people He was speaking to at the time the good practice of these things was very important to living a prosperous and virtuous life.
So personally--and with respect--I just have to question when people who identify themselves as highly religious and pious, like Amish people who run puppy mills (and again, the vast majority of Amish DO NOT run puppy mills) exhibit such inhumane treatment of the living things we are charged with being 'Good Shepards of. The cell phone loophole, okay, it's a stretch, but I can see how you can reason yourself there. This one, not so much.
Here is the announcement NSAL has been circulating, so be prepared for the media blitz. Like I said, they're really building up the pre-event blitz:
Operation Puppy Mill Rescue -- NEEDS VOLUNTEERS
As the largest rescue and adoption organization in the world, North Shore Animal League America is often called upon to assist or conduct special rescue operations. Sadly, one of our most common rescue efforts is saving dogs from the horrors of puppy mills.Our next mill dog rescue is scheduled for August 24, 2009 and we're expecting MORE THAN 100 ANIMALS to arrive at our Port Washington, NY headquarters.
We are currently seeking qualified individuals who live in the NY, NJ, and CT tri-state area willing to donate their time and energy to the cause of helping these animals.We are looking for:
New York State Licensed Veterinarians
Experienced Veterinary Technicians (New York State license a plus)
Groomers
Foster Care Guardians
We are also in need of several items to help care for these dogs such as:
New or gently used towels
New or gently used washcloths
New appropriate bones and toys;a list of which can be found here:
To volunteer, please e-mail CassandraF@AnimalLeague.org and put "Puppy Mill" in the subject line.
...or, at least it will hit the media by then.
This is interesting, because they've been sort-of 'building up a buzz' about it for the past week or so, sending out a call for volunteers, and even the National Association of Pet Professionals put out a press release saying they're ready to help.
I tried to ask NSAL directly what's up, where the dogs are coming from, background, etc., but no luck. But I wonder if they're going to come from Pennsylvania. Wouldn't bet my life on it, but thinking they might because the Times just wrote this for pretty much no 'immediate' reason, just kind of reiterating old news (important news, but still old)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/us/18dogs.html?_r=1&emc=tnt&tntemail1=y
Almost seems like a 'prep story' so that when the 'big' puppy mill rescue story breaks it will look like they (the Times) are at least on top of the issue. (On top of the the topic?).
In any case, I've put it at the bottom of my extended commentary. They need volunteers, especially those in the pet profession like groomers, vets and vet techs, as well as the usual. All relevant contact information is at the bottom of this post.
I have to say when it comes to the puppy mill thing, and knowing that Lancaster, Pennsylvania is one of the hot spots, I am very saddened. What is not emphasized too much--perhaps for very sensitive reasons--is that a number of these puppy mill purveyors are Amish. Remember, the Amish are one of the fantastic anomalies of this century. They live simply with little to no 'modern' conveniences and in many cases are the last of the true subsidence farmers in the United States. They pay no taxes nor get or receive Social Security. In essence, they are following to the best of their ability their faith which tells them to be 'not in the world.'
But when things like this happen crime and punishment and whether you're subject to the earthly laws can get a little murky. Crime happens in Amish country, both by and against the Amish, just like anywhere else. Don't hear about it as much, obviously. And even amongst themselves they have different versions of being 'in' the world. For example, I happen to love 'Amish Country.' (I'm a city girl who every once in a while needs to be surrounded by nature, and when I do so, I go all the way.) Few years back Bill and I were staying in a farmhouse adjacent to a working Amish farm and low and behold--we see an Amish farmer using an 18th century plow (oxen and all!) talking on a cell phone at the same time! Mind freak, indeed! So we asked our hosts whazzup wit dat? And they told us, well, cell phones are allowed because they are not connected to power lines, which are connected to 'the world', etc. Okay, so they found a loophole. To this day Bill still argues with me about that and how that is 'cheating.' Ehh...
Anyway...what was I talking about again? Oh yes, puppy mills in Amish country (and again, not all puppy mills in Amish country are run by the Amish, just happens to be a lot of open space there and a convenient location a few hours drive from a number of major cities.) But when they are run by the Amish, I get very sad. I'm not shy to say that I'm Christian (a very, VERY liberal, VERY poor excuse for one who cringes everytime I see wackozoid Fundies representing all of us--they don't.) I do identify with the basic tenants of the faith, so perhaps it is not for me to judge. But it would seem that one of our pillars of faith is to be 'Good Shepards' of the earth and all of creation; one of Jesus' most beloved parables is the shepherd who goes out of his way to retrieve the one lost sheep, and in other parables He speaks at length about reaping and sowing. Obviously these are not to be taken literally, but it shows that to the people He was speaking to at the time the good practice of these things was very important to living a prosperous and virtuous life.
So personally--and with respect--I just have to question when people who identify themselves as highly religious and pious, like Amish people who run puppy mills (and again, the vast majority of Amish DO NOT run puppy mills) exhibit such inhumane treatment of the living things we are charged with being 'Good Shepards of. The cell phone loophole, okay, it's a stretch, but I can see how you can reason yourself there. This one, not so much.
Here is the announcement NSAL has been circulating, so be prepared for the media blitz. Like I said, they're really building up the pre-event blitz:
Operation Puppy Mill Rescue -- NEEDS VOLUNTEERS
As the largest rescue and adoption organization in the world, North Shore Animal League America is often called upon to assist or conduct special rescue operations. Sadly, one of our most common rescue efforts is saving dogs from the horrors of puppy mills.Our next mill dog rescue is scheduled for August 24, 2009 and we're expecting MORE THAN 100 ANIMALS to arrive at our Port Washington, NY headquarters.
We are currently seeking qualified individuals who live in the NY, NJ, and CT tri-state area willing to donate their time and energy to the cause of helping these animals.We are looking for:
New York State Licensed Veterinarians
Experienced Veterinary Technicians (New York State license a plus)
Groomers
Foster Care Guardians
We are also in need of several items to help care for these dogs such as:
New or gently used towels
New or gently used washcloths
New appropriate bones and toys;a list of which can be found here:
To volunteer, please e-mail CassandraF@AnimalLeague.org and put "Puppy Mill" in the subject line.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
